The Journal and Courier reports that 39-year-old Paul M. Brock of Frankfort was charged Wednesday with auto theft, resisting law enforcement, intimidation and operating a vehicle while intoxicated.
Police in Lafayette, 60 miles northwest of Indianapolis, used dogs to subdue Brock during his arrest on Friday.
Police say Brock later told officers that he would hunt them down and eat them, their families and their dogs. He had a blood-alcohol content more than three times Indiana's legal limit.
Police officers and their families could be a good source of proteins, consumed in moderation, of course. As for police dogs: no, Paul, this could put your head on the chopping block if PETA get wind of this idea.
The true goal of Zionism is to wipe out all non-Jewish peoples in vast parts of Egypt, including most of its north, all of Sinai and Cairo, all of Jordan, all of Kuwait, a gargantuan portion of Saudi Arabia, all of Lebanon, all of Syria, all of Cyprus, an elephantine part of Turkey up to Lake Van and finally, part of Iraq south of the Euphrates River.
Puny minds set puny goals, dear Ayatollahs. Details by JudeoPundit.
Israeli warplanes dropped an unidentified object in southern Lebanon on Tuesday, Lebanon's official news agency reported, adding that Lebanese security forces were yet unable to ascertain what the nature of the item.
But really, why can't we all get along without that thick (and sick) atmosphere of secrecy in the Middle East? Google, at least, has done their fair share to disperse this fog. Here it is, direct from the link above:
You can clearly see that the mysterious dropped object is huge, blue and its shape reminds of that thingy some guitar players use (they call it "pick", I believe).
A interesting link to The Commentator turned up in my inbox this am: an article asking (rhetorically, of course) why the Metropolitan Police won't prosecute those (all identified and on tape) who disrupted the BBC Proms concert last September. Comment no. 4 is interesting, for its brevity and its one-eyed view of things. If published, my comment, 2 or 3 below it, as well as the one above it, seek to respond with a little sense and logic. The saddest part here is the suggestion by the IPO's managers that they may not return to the UK, in order to protect the musicians and their instruments. I hope they do, otherwise the cultural vandals win. Perhaps we should collectively petition the IPO to reconsider this action.
I'm not sure that you're likely to see this on, for example "truther" (i.e., about what really happened on 9/11) websites, but a US District Judge (in New York) said, back in December, that he was going to hand down a judgement that Iran, at the very least, shared responsibility for the twin towers and Pentagon attacks of that day.
Actually, having glanced at a few of the 400+ comments on the article, perhaps you might, especially if said sites don't also believe that it was Mossad wot done it. I feel on firmer ground when I suggest that the "progressive left" will reject as Islamaphobic the Judge's comments. Among his insights are the following: 'U.S. District Court Judge George Daniels said...“The extensive record submitted...is satisfactory to this court"…The court “accepts as true” the various allegations of the plaintiffs and their experts...'
The case was brought by relatives of victims of the 9/11 attacks who believe that Iran was behind the attack, and many of them were in court to hear the judgement. This is unlikely to have much influence on anything, and almost certainly won't result in any successful case against Iran for compensation, but it does keep the threats posed by islamist and jihadist groups in the public eye.
Spoiler warning: "The Daily Caller" is an online paper based in New York City, and appears to be just a tad to the left of Genghis Khan.
As Blazing Cat Fur says, it's a real beauty. But be warned, you don't want to leave this document open on your screen with kids around. And if you click on it, you've confirmed that you are of age that is suitable for perusing it in your location. So here:
If you are interested in the roots of the whole story, check out this one.
With all the noise and excitement caused by the latest ultra-Orthodox shenanigans here, one should be careful indeed to keep a modicum of objectivity. The exclusion of women, the vicious attacks on the streets, the cursing and spitting, the separation on some bus lines - all this can't leave a person indifferent, no matter what his political credo or stance on the religion. On the other hand, if, as the popular claim goes, the above mentioned barbarous acts are the deed of a minuscule group of zealots, the police should be able to deal with them easily (that it can't or wouldn't is another matter, for another discussion).
The public response is, in general, a consensus and pretty bi-partisan. It's nice to see that at least in some respects we can still remain in agreement. However, sounds of dissonance are coming from Ha'aretz, the leftist mouthpiece, and here is a good example: and article titled Just don't make Israel 'too Jewish' by one Meron Rapaport. It is subtly subtitled Why this outburst against the ultra-Orthodox is different from all the others. To my surprise, in this unique case of across-the-board consensus, Ha'aretz has chosen to stand firm - against it. Against the consensus, of course.
Whether the stand is based on the regular principle of government-biting or some other principle that escapes me, I cannot rightly say. In any case, Meron Rapaport knows that "the secular public's criticism this time does not focus solely on the allocation of funds or sharing the burden of military service. It touches on the very essence of the ultra-Orthodox lifestyle".
If you don't see the poisonous tip of this clumsy arrow, look again. According to our Meron, it is not the attacks on secular (or not religious enough for the zealots) people that caused the public outcry, it is the "secular public's" desire to intervene into peaceful life of the ultra-Orthodox community.
But quite quickly the article turns from "the secular public's criticism" to unrestrained bashing of the right-wing government which, in Rapoport's mind, is the main culprit and instigator of the secular persecution of religious community. For instance:
Take Lieberman, for example. In a Yedioth Ahronoth interview last weekend, he sought to use the anti-ultra-Orthodox sentiments to dismantle the religious councils, i.e., take apart one of the cornerstones linking religion (Judaism ) to the state (Israel ).
Yeah, Meron. There is nothing wrong per se in bashing our government. Or bashing Lieberman, for that matter. Lieberman could do with as much bashing as possible (not that it would have any effect on him, mind you). But if there is a good point Lieberman ever made, it's precisely that one. And if it is possible to take apart all cornerstones linking religion (Judaism ) to the state (Israel) - more power to Lieberman. That largely secular-lefty Ha'aretz will take a stand against the government in this issue is about as natural as rabbits lying down with pythons. Unless the knee-jerk anti-government reflexes are the only factor that drives Ha'aretz.
Bashing for the sake of bashing is a stupid habit, Meron. Want to know why? Look no further than your own newspaper:
I think that Israeli democracy, under its current structure, is in constant conflict with its Jewish identity, and in recent years, every time it bends its Jewish identity backwards. This structure of democracy has only one mission: to dismantle.
At a certain point in the argument, as it appeared that Michaeli was about to leave the room to calm down, she poured a cup of water and threw the contents at Majadele. Following that, she left the room in fury.
Anyway, it's better one time to see:
What can one say? One or two remarks, maybe:
Both participants in that brawl deserve a cold water shower.
Ms Michaeli could do with an ice bath on top of that shower (or on the bottom, whatever).
Now she has a month time (suspended by the ethics committee) to cool off.
Producing eight kids in a short period of time must have caused some mineral deficiency.
A blonde joke would be fitting at this point, but the times are not suitable for one. So, let's just say: a blonde walks into the Knesset... and be done with it.
Oh well, it simply cannot be avoided: she is a looker, our Anastasia!
And not much of a blonde, too. So it is easier to understand that temper.
