28 April 2015

Israeli assistance to Nepal and the usual responses

Every single time that a catastrophe like this happens, when Israel sends its rescue teams and medics, the usual crowd of little shits wakes up with their knee-jerk responses:


Now, imagine the same crowd responses if Israel didn't send assistance...

Via FB user Mark Lott, with thanks.

13 comments:

Sennacherib said...

Tis truly the Goon, Sennacherib rejoices. There shall be sacrifices.

Akaky said...

Rania Khalek is hot! If she's as stupid in real life as she is on the Net, maybe I've got a chance with her!

SnoopyTheGoon said...

Absolutely, and the more the merrier.

Dick Stanley said...

With Jews like these, who needs enemies? You can't win with these creeps and there's no sense trying.

Dick Stanley said...

Put a shopping bag over head and have at it.

SnoopyTheGoon said...

Yeah, Mr Roth and Mr Blumenthal are two vermin of the sleaziest kind, for sure.

SnoopyTheGoon said...

Of reinforced plastic, I would add.

dba_vagabond_trader said...

Would be interested to hear what the muslim world has done to relieve the suffering in Nepal.

Lynne T said...

Here's what Nick Cohen wrote about Kenneth Roth in "What's Left" back in 2007.
I'll let you decide the most appropriate adjectives and nouns for him:
"Human Rights Watch, which had made its name as a rival to Amnesty with its investigations into Saddam's Iraq, tied its tongue in knots as it tried to find a way to oppose the war to overthrow him. Kenneth Roth, its director, came up with a canting formula that there was no humanitarian purpose to the war because, although there had been mass slaughter, ethnic cleansing and environmental destruction over thirty-five years, 'no such slaughter was then ongoing or imminent' at the precise moment in 2000 when the war began. His lawyerly point was that although the Baathists were still killing, they were killing at a slower rate than in the past; the numbers of rapes and the intensity of the persecution of ethnic minorities were not up to their previous speed and nothing could be done until Saddam pulled his socks up and improved the strike rate. The British political philosopher, Norman Geras [sadly now deceased about 2 - 3 years ago] explained Human Rights Watch's new take on human rights thus: 'The criteria for humanitarian intervention by Kenneth Roth (among others) would allow a regime that had just massacred, let us say, two million of its own people, but had finished massacring them, to stand with its sovereignty and international legitimacy intact'."

SnoopyTheGoon said...

Well, I believe there was some monetary assistance, but the chart I have seen has disappeared somewhere.

SnoopyTheGoon said...

Always good and sharp, isn't Nick?

Jimithefox said...

And the BBC - this time Mark Urban and not Bowen. Good for Ruth Davidson (leader of the Scottish Conservatives).:

https://twitter.com/RuthDavidsonMSP/status/593754296363196417

SnoopyTheGoon said...

Ruth Davison... what is it with Scots that really do have it in for Israel? That book "When the Scotland Was Jewish" has done a lot of mental damage, I suspect.