Disproportionate response vs disproportionate response

As usual when Israel defending itself is involved, the net is ablaze with accusations of disproportionate response on our part. I thought about making a nice roundup of links to relevant articles, but then the readers will still be glued to the monitors by Christmas. Here's just one example, complete with the excellent response of CiF Watch.

The point nobody seems to be grasping is that a proportionate response would mean that, since neither side will ever have the upper hand, wars will never end. Is this truly what the peace loving critics of Israel's disproportionate response want?

It occurred to me, reading the previous post, that the reaction of the international community is also pretty disproportionate. Look at the 10,000 gazans housed in shelters by UNRWA. Then take a look at the millions of israelis under permanent rocket attacks (and threats of) from Gaza (for more than 10 years) and Lebanon (for decades). I, for one, looked long and hard. Nope. No international UN body for threatened israelis, although many of them are refugees from (then) war-thorn Europe and muslim countries. Some are even refugees from Gaza...

Would it be too brazen to ask for some proportionate response from said international community?