I have said (elsewhere) that I suspected that Hillary Clinton, the former US Secretary of State, would have been much more forceful (read "against") the "agreement" between the 5+1 group and Iran. That is, she would have argued for a maintenance of sanctions against Iran until the latter proved their good intentions (if possible) re nuclear research/uranium enrichment.
The article Hillary Clinton Says Israel’s Strong Stance on Iran Has Helped the U.S. demonstrates, in my view, the truth of this contention. That is, Obama and Kerry are less than interested in a real agreement and more interested in strutting over their statesmanship...whatever that means.
Does it mean, in a very real male way, "mine's bigger than yours"?
By Brian Goldfarb.
4 hours ago
9 comments:
We always knew who has the balls in THAT family.
I think this just means that Clinton is running for President. Members of her own party think Obama's deal with Iran is a bad one. She needs lots of Jewish dollars to run for President. So she is smart enough to know which stance will play well. In Clinton world all that matters is what is good for Clinton world.
No disagreement here.
Long, long been rumored that the Hildabeast is transgender. At the very least a cross-dresser. And it would be easy for s/h/e/it to have bigger ones than Lurch, since he has none to begin with.
Like this entry very much! Glad that Hillary was positively mentioned, even if it is regarding something that she allegedly does not have. Too bad that this only came up as a comparison to the two weaklings that allegedly have these implements but did not get the users' manual.
;-)
Alleging is easy. Hillary has already lied several times re Israel, so her record is quite patchy, I have to say.
Patchy is kind, unnecessarily kind for a life-long liar. She's still frantically shoveling Benghazi under her rug.
Along with many other things, but isn't it a typicla life story of a pol?
Post a Comment