The Price of International inaction is the quagmire we find ourselves immersed in now.Will this voice be heard by enough people to matter? I hope so.
2 hours ago
02 September 2013
To strike, not to strike, or how to strike
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I doubt very much that Assad is the only guilty party here, even if one of his pilots did recently drop napalm on a schoolyard. There's a case to be made for the idea that, if poison gas (Sarin, being heavier than air, really isn't a gas but why argue the fine points) really was used, that the Jihadis had as much to gain by its use as Assad did. Especially if they could blame it on him. And if Obongo really does fire off something besides his mouth, which I doubt he will, it's as likely to be to back his Jihadi pals as to damage Assad: http://tinyurl.com/mmasydo
Be it as it may, the overwhelming majority of the people who died in the last gas attack where "bystanders", including lots of kids. As for who used the chemical weapons, I think we should wait a bit more and see what develops. Take a look at the link in the Che post, the Assad supporters claim to have proof about Saudis supplying chemical weapons to the rebels.
You mean like Lurch's proof? This whole thing is edging closer and closer to farce.
Thanks for linking to this post, Snoopy.
You are welcome.
Post a Comment