Political aspiration of paedophiles

Seeing is believing, they say. I am seeing it, but the believing part comes harder.

There is outrage in the Netherlands after paedophiles launched a political party to push for a cut in the legal age of consent. The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party wants the age dropped from 16 to 12, before having it scrapped completely, and also wants child pornography and sex with animals to be legalised, sparking a massive backlash in the liberal country. The vast majority of the Dutch public now believe the government should step in and outlaw the group.

I am not at all sure about outlawing. This is too easy and the only thing it does is get these nice folks to go underground. I would fulfill their wish re sex with animals, under a few simple conditions: that a) said sex will be enforced on the party members and continuous; b) the animals in question be donkeys (specifically jacks) over age of consent for donkeys; c) subject to ASPCA approval; d) any necessary tools of restraint be employed in case of refusal.

Upon second thought, there is another condition related to the following picture of the wannabe party founder Ad van den Berg:









To ease the ASPCA agreement, an additional condition is proposed: that the party members' faces be covered at all times to avoid mental damage to the participating donkeys.

The only curious item in the above linked article is:

The party also said everybody should be allowed to go naked in public and promotes legalising all soft and hard drugs and free train travel for all.

Does this specific group of paedophiles link the use of drugs to train travel? Interesting...

P.S. Upon reading the original article another time, I became not so sure whether the picture in this post is of Ad van den Berg, of the article's author or even a member of "the vast majority of the Dutch public". Since the answer to this question is pertinent only to the issue of face cover, it is secondary anyway.