tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18234909.post1575357011976805903..comments2024-01-22T04:45:58.881+02:00Comments on Simply Jews: The Council Has Spoken!GideonSworthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13951672633294843881noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18234909.post-21249145340730906672015-01-31T21:37:32.717+02:002015-01-31T21:37:32.717+02:00I don't know what to say, d.agut, dear: your p...I don't know what to say, d.agut, dear: your previous post was almost moderately tempered, and I was full of hope that we are becoming fast friends. Now you came out with that outburst. Are you sure your shoes don't pinch? But I shall answer a few points of yours, no matter how you feel:<br /><br />"I don't know what bothers me more about you: your incapacity for logic" <br />Yeah, maybe, but you still didn't show that you understand the original post, see below.<br /><br />"you're sure Nisman was murdered, i.e. there was a conspiracy to murder him"<br />Not at all, just laughing at conspiracy nuts. And you should too. <br /><br />"your arrogance in thinking you understand issues in this country, of which it is evident you haven't the faintest idea"<br />No such claim should be evident, simply because I didn't make it and it isn't true anyway. But I do have some understanding (you may call it basic) of this here country, and I know a scumbag when I see one.<br /><br />"Anyway, hope I've made you happy: thanks to me, this piece of shit post of yours now has six comments! Which is probably the highest number of any posts in this blog, based on what I've seen." <br />I have to disappoint you - I am not being paid by the number of comments, only by the number of words in my posts. Of course, I am getting a bonus when a reader shows that he/she understood the post I wrote. In your case, unfortunately, I am not getting any dough... too bad.<br /><br />Bye.SnoopyTheGoonhttp://simplyjews.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18234909.post-64263822463921230602015-01-31T16:27:12.359+02:002015-01-31T16:27:12.359+02:00I don't know what bothers me more about you: y...I don't know what bothers me more about you: your incapacity for logic (you claim to attack conspiracy nuts, yet you're sure Nisman was murdered, i.e. there was a conspiracy to murder him), your arrogance in thinking you understand issues in this country, of which it is evident you haven't the faintest idea; your agressiveness evident from your very first post, which you ended by calling Margalit a "scumbag"... Anyway, hope I've made you happy: thanks to me, this piece of shit post of yours now has six comments! Which is probably the highest number of any posts in this blog, based on what I've seen. Anyway, it's over--bye.d.agutnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18234909.post-67502879590648796382015-01-31T10:52:27.696+02:002015-01-31T10:52:27.696+02:00Dear d.agut,
You have surprised me on two counts....Dear d.agut,<br /><br />You have surprised me on two counts. First of all, by revisiting this post and commenting again. Secondly, by being relatively civil. Relatively, that is, compared to the previous visit. Good.<br /><br />One thing didn't change, though: you still disregard both the original post and my explanation of its motives. I don't know whether your ignore these for lack of understanding or unwillingness to face the fact that you missed the point. <br /><br />The bombings, the people involved, the many motives and suspicions surrounding the story are one big mess, as is excellently presented (for instance) in this article:<br /><br />http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4621026,00.html<br /><br />But my post wasn't about resolving this mess, which fact you still can't understand.<br /><br />The mere suggestion that there was a bomb inside the building puts the person who suggests it squarely in the camp of conspiracy seekers. Sorry, I shall leave you and the author of the idea to ponder it.<br /><br />"If you want to argue, you have to do your homework" No, I don't want to argue the conspiracy theories and I don't have to. Please let me have anad use my small privileges. <br /><br />"So I assume that you think that I think that Jewish people were implicated in the bombings." No, I don't, full stop. I am not at all paranoid.<br /><br />"So what I'm saying is that the U.S. is interested in blaming Iran, for whatever reason, and diverting the investigation from the Syrian connection and also, most importantly, from the local connection, who were most probably the actual perpetrators." Possible, but than you disregard that I already said "possible" about other versions. Aside of the pre-inserted bomb, which is rather a fruit of feverish imagination of conspiracy buffs.<br /><br />"Anyway, I won't argue with you. You don't deserve the benefit of argument." Hm... that sounds a bit strange, after a hundred lines of text or so. I am not a consultant or anything in that area, but I guess you may need to beef up your logical skills.<br /><br />"I have to say that this is my first contact with someone from the Jewish political Right." As teenagers say: OMG! You really need to get out more, dear d.agut. A "political Right", Jewish or not, will not behave like we here do. Not at all, and this is all I can say on the subject.<br /><br />In short: try to read the original post again and understand what it is about. Hint: it is not about resolving the mystery of the bombings or even the mystery of Nisman's murder (I hope you will allow me to call it murder, unless someone already created a theory that the bullet in his brain was installed previously by some right-wing element).<br /><br />Another hint I can give you free: a person is not necessarily correct in something even if a person belongs to the same political camp you do. That is quite an important lesson. Its corollary is: a person is not necessarily incorrect in something, even if a person belongs to some other political branch.<br /><br />Cheers.SnoopyTheGoonhttp://simplyjews.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.com